.17 HMR vs .17 WSM: Which is the Better Choice for Small Game Hunting?

Hunting
1

I’m currently debating between the .17 HMR and the .17 WSM for my upcoming hunting trips and would appreciate any insights you all might have. Both cartridges have their pros and cons, and I’m trying to figure out which one will suit my needs best.

Overview of .17 HMR and .17 WSM

The .17 HMR (Hornady Magnum Rimfire) has been popular among small game hunters due to its flat trajectory and accuracy. It’s known for being a very effective cartridge for varmint hunting. On the other hand, the .17 WSM (Winchester Super Magnum) is a newer option that offers higher velocity and energy levels, which could give it an edge in certain scenarios.

Performance Metrics

  • Velocity and Energy: The .17 WSM typically delivers higher velocity than the .17 HMR. This can be a deciding factor if you’re looking at distance shooting. The greater energy can also result in a more effective kill on small game. It’s worth considering how far your shots might be when making this choice.

  • Ballistics: The ballistics of both cartridges are relatively impressive, but the flatness of the .17 HMR can offer better accuracy at shorter distances. If you’re targeting animals that might be a bit closer, perhaps the HMR is what you need to go for. However, for longer distances, the WSM looks stronger on paper.

Practical Usage

When it comes to real-world scenarios:

  • Hunting Small Game: I’ve heard stories of hunters using both cartridges successfully, but it seems like hunters who deal with longer ranges lean towards the .17 WSM.
  • Cost and Availability: One major factor is the cost and availability of ammunition. The .17 HMR has been around longer, so finding ammo should be easier. The .17 WSM, while gaining popularity, can sometimes be harder to procure at reasonable prices.

Other Considerations

  • Rifles and Availability: If you’re purchasing a new rifle for either cartridge, another point is the variety of options available. More manufacturers offer rifles for the HMR so you might find a greater selection to suit your preferences.
  • Your Shooting Experience: Ultimately, your comfort and previous experiences with either cartridge can play a significant role in your decision.

I’d love to hear your thoughts—especially if you’ve used both cartridges. What’s your experience with either one? Which do you think provides better performance for small game hunting? Looking forward to your replies!

2

.17 HMR is more established and has a great track record for small game. It offers decent ballistics up to 200 yards with a flatter trajectory. I’ve hunted rabbits successfully with it.

1 Like
3

.17 WSM packs more powder, which translates to higher velocity and cleaner kills at longer ranges. I’ve noticed a significant difference in terminal performance while hunting coyote.

4

Both cartridges are great, but ballistically, the .17 WSM has a notable advantage with faster speeds and better energy retention over longer distances. It really depends on your typical hunting range.

5

I appreciate the insights! I’m considering the range since I mainly hunt in dense woods. Would the .17 HMR be better in that scenario?

6

In those conditions, the .17 HMR might be preferable. Its lower recoil and quieter shot can be advantageous for close-range shots.

6 Likes
7

.17 WSM’s flatter trajectory is impressive for open fields, but does that make it less effective in tighter spaces? I’ve heard mixed opinions.

8

I’ve used both, and while I love the speed of the .17 WSM, I actually prefer the .17 HMR for small game close to cover. Plus, it’s usually cheaper to shoot!

9

It’s funny, I feel like enthusiasts can be really passionate about these calibers. I mean, the .17 WSM is like the new kid on the block stealing the HMR’s thunder! But both have their place.

10

HMR is often more accessible, which is a plus for those just getting into small game hunting. What’s everyone’s take on ammo availability?

4 Likes
11

Honestly, I think the choice boils down to personal preference and specific hunting scenarios. Just getting a .17 WSM has me excited, though! Any tips for the first use?

12

Just practice a bit! The recoil is a bit different than the HMR, so take some time to get used to it before hitting the field.

13

.17 HMR is great for small game! I’ve used it for years and it’s accurate. For a rifle, check out the Savage Mark II; it’s affordable and reliable!

6 Likes
14

I agree! The .17 HMR gives a nice flat trajectory. However, have you considered the .17 WSM? It packs a bit more punch!

15

.17 WSM is a newer option and offers higher velocity. For ammo, I recommend the Winchester 20 grain; it’s been solid in my experience!

16

I’ve seen some reviews that rave about it, but is it really worth the extra cost? What do others think?

17

.17 WSM can be pricier, but the better ballistics make up for it. I’ve had success with the Savage B.Mag; it’s super fun to shoot!

18

Totally agree with jacob07! The B.Mag is lightweight, making it perfect for a long day of hunting. Plus, it’s really easy to carry.

19

.17 HMR might be cheaper, but if you’re targeting larger small game, you might prefer the .17 WSM. But what do others think about their experiences?

3 Likes
20

That’s the million-dollar question! Both have their merits; it ultimately depends on what you’re hunting.