338 Lapua vs 338 Rem Ultra Mag: Which One is Right for You?

Intro

When it comes to long-range shooting and hunting, the debate between the 338 Lapua and the 338 Remington Ultra Mag (Ultra Mag) is a hot topic among enthusiasts. Both cartridges have their strong points and cater to different preferences and shooting scenarios. If you’re pondering which one might suit your needs better, here’s a breakdown to help you decide.

Ballistics Comparison

  • 338 Lapua
    The 338 Lapua is known for its incredible ballistic performance. It typically shoots heavier bullets (between 250-300 grains) and maintains high velocity over long distances. The Lapua also features a flatter trajectory, making it a prime choice for precision shooting.

  • 338 Rem Ultra Mag
    The Ultra Mag offers a slightly lighter bullet option compared to the Lapua (ranging from 200-250 grains) but still delivers significant power and excellent performance at long ranges. While it may have a slightly more pronounced drop than the Lapua, the Ultra Mag compensates with speed.

Effective Range

  • 338 Lapua
    Known for its range, the Lapua can effectively be used at distances exceeding 1,500 yards, substantially outperforming most other cartridges.

  • 338 Rem Ultra Mag
    The Ultra Mag, while capable of long-range shooting, typically shines at distances up to 1,200 yards. If extreme long-range is critical for your shooting style, the Lapua might be the better option.

Recoil and Shootability

  • Recoil
    The 338 Lapua does have a heavier recoil due to its larger case capacity and heavier bullet options. This can make it somewhat challenging for sustained shooting sessions, particularly for novice shooters.

    In contrast, the 338 Rem Ultra Mag’s recoil, while still substantial, is often considered more manageable, making it a possible choice for those who plan on spending a day at the range.

Game Suitability

  • 338 Lapua
    This cartridge is often favored by hunters seeking to take down larger game at great distances, such as moose and elk. Its accuracy and energy retention make it highly effective for these scenarios.

  • 338 Rem Ultra Mag
    The Ultra Mag is versatile and can also handle large game well, but it excels in medium to large game hunting scenarios. If you’re hunting in varied conditions where mobility and versatility are key, it’s a solid choice.

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the 338 Lapua and the 338 Remington Ultra Mag ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If your focus is on extreme long-range accuracy and you can manage the recoil, the Lapua might be the way to go. However, if you’re looking for a more versatile round that’s easier to shoot, the Ultra Mag is definitely worth considering.

What are your experiences with these cartridges? Do you have any preferences based on your shooting situations? Let’s discuss!

8 Likes

I’ve spent a lot of time shooting both calibers, and I’ve found that the .338 Lapua offers superior ballistic performance at long distances. Its higher velocity really helps maintain energy past 1,000 yards.

That’s interesting! I always thought the .338 Rem Ultra Mag would edge out in energy retention. What velocities are you seeing with your Lapua loads?

From my experience, the .338 Rem Ultra Mag tends to have a flatter trajectory initially, but after 800 yards, the Lapua takes over. Both are great, but it depends on your intended use!

6 Likes

Exactly, crystal46! The initial velocity of the Ultra Mag is impressive, but the Lapua does tend to carry its energy better. It’s really a trade-off based on what you prioritize in your shooting.

I read a study showing the .338 Lapua maintaining over 2,800 ft-lbs of energy at 1,200 yards. That’s hard to beat! I’m sold on the Lapua for anything beyond 1,000 yards.

Whoa, that’s impressive! Can you share the study you mentioned? I’m curious to see more data on this comparison.

I don’t have the exact link, but there’s a good review on .338 performance on Sniper’s Hide. Both calibers shine—just choose based on range and application!

I appreciate the insights! I’m leaning towards the .338 Lapua for long-range hunting, but I can’t ignore the shorter range benefits of the Ultra Mag. It seems case-by-case.

Both rounds are fantastic for long-range shooting, but don’t forget the recoil! The Lapua can really deliver a wallop.

I’ve heard that! Is the recoil from the Ultra Mag much more manageable then?

It is! The .338 Rem Ultra Mag is definitely more forgiving, which can make a difference at the range. Just one of those factors to consider!

5 Likes

LOL, sounds like you need a good shoulder pad for the Lapua! But honestly, the data and experiences shared here are super helpful for deciding.

2 Likes

I’ve been looking into the 338 Lapua and found that while it’s a bit pricier, the availability of premium ammunition is impressive. If you’re into long-range shooting, it’s worth the investment.

That’s true! However, I’ve had decent experiences with the 338 Rem Ultra Mag too. It’s often more affordable, and you can find good quality ammo at local shops.

2 Likes

In terms of cost, I noticed the 338 Rem Ultra Mag ammo can be found for about $10-$15 less per box compared to the Lapua. This makes it a more budget-friendly option for regular shooting.

7 Likes

That’s a great point! Plus, handloading for the Ultra Mag can save even more money and offer customization options, which is fantastic for precision shooters.

I’ve been reloading both cartridges for a while now. The 338 Lapua can be finicky, but once you get it dialed in, it delivers. However, the options for the Ultra Mag seem more abundant in bulk packs.

5 Likes

I wonder how many of you have tested both cartridges side by side? Is there a noticeable difference in shooting performance for hunting vs. target practice?

Great question, Preston! I mostly use the 338 Lapua for long-range hunting, and the precision is unmatched. But for just target practice, the Ultra Mag does the job without breaking the bank.