On top of that, I recommend using a chronograph to monitor your velocities. It’s invaluable for dialing in loads specifically for your rifle!
Great tip! I started using one recently, and it really helps track your load progress over time. What velocities are you seeing with your loads?
With my recent load, I’m averaging around 3100 fps with a 140 grain bullet. Not too shabby! How’s the recoil for you guys? Mine is surprisingly manageable.
Agreed, the recoil on the 6.5-300 is quite pleasant, especially compared to the .300 Win Mag. It definitely makes shooting for extended sessions much more enjoyable!
However, I’ve heard some folks say it can be a bit punishing when working up loads with too much powder. Moderation is key! Keep it fun, or else you’ll be bruised!
Haha, definitely! A little gunpowder never killed anyone; just don’t go overboard! Has anyone tried lighter bullets for better recoil management?
I’m really excited about the 6.5-300 Weatherby! The ballistics are impressive at 1000 yards, and I love how it balances velocity with moderate recoil compared to .270 Winchester.
Absolutely! The 6.5-300 has a flatter trajectory and more energy at range than the .260 Remington, which gives it an edge for long-range shooting.
The recoil can definitely be a concern with the 6.5-300. Although some claim it’s manageable, I still find that it’s heavier than both the .260 Remington and .270 Winchester.
That’s true, but considering the performance, it might be worth it. It outperforms many popular options in velocity.
4 Likes
I think the effective range is where the 6.5-300 really shines. It can easily exceed 1000 yards with precision, especially with a good handload.
Exactly! I find that the combination of velocity and ballistic coefficient makes it really competitive out there.
1 Like
I’m curious, how do reloaders find the availability of components for the 6.5-300 in comparison to the more common .270 or .260? That might play another role in performance!
7 Likes
Great point! I think it can be harder to find components compared to .260 Remington or .270, which may be a consideration for reloaders.
Even with some difficulty in component availability, I still believe the 6.5-300 outshines others when it comes to long-range performance for precision shooters.
You might be right, but I still think .270 Winchester has a fanbase due to its versatility, especially for hunting.
8 Likes
For sure, but let’s not forget that the .270 can also deliver some serious recoil! It definitely packs a punch that can give even the 6.5-300 a run for its money!
Haha, true! The 6.5-300 might be the hipster choice with less mainstream appeal, but it delivers! Long live the oddball cartridges!
6 Likes